AGENCY FAILS TO COMPLY WITH GENERAL LIABILITY AND E&O CLAIM NOTICE REQUIREMENTS
389_C053
AGENCY FAILS TO COMPLY WITH GENERAL LIABILITY AND E&O CLAIM NOTICE REQUIREMENTS

Agents and Brokers

Agents' Errors And Omissions

 

Employers Reinsurance Corporation issued its General Liability and E&O policy to the E. Miller Insurance Agency. Edward Miller, Sr., and his son, Edward Miller, Jr., were also named insureds. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance Company, A. J. Maggio Company, and Power Construction were defendants in an action for declaratory judgment filed by Employers.

 

The evidence showed that the Miller Agency had issued certificates of insurance to Maggio and Power Construction. In December 1995, Northbrook sued the Miller agency (and its agents) for consumer fraud, breach of fiduciary duties and breach of contract. The agency was served with summons and complaint on January 16, 1996. Employers did not receive notice until March 1997. However, Employers received notice of the suit on March 22, 1996, from the attorney for Northbrook. (That litigation was still pending at the time of the appeal in the declaratory judgment action.)

 

The higher court found that Northbrook's notice was sufficient compliance with the policy requirement for prompt notice. Employers then wrote to the Miller Agency for information and documentation but received no response. Two more letters were sent. Employers began its investigation after reserving its rights. Consequently, since the insureds breached their duty to cooperate, Employers was entitled to assert lack of cooperation, as required in the policy.

 

The judgment entered in the trial court against Employers was reversed, and summary judgment was entered in favor of Employers.

 

Employers Reinsurance Corporation, Appellant, v. E. Miller Insurance Agency, Inc., et al.-No. 1-01-0579-Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division-June 28, 2002. Rehearing denied August 6, 2002-773 North Eastern Reporter 2d 707